Larghetto (originally second movement of the Sonata no. 31) E flat major
Sonata Piano solo
In brief

This Larghetto in E-flat unfolds as a calm, singing movement where the melody breathes between silences and light ornamentation rather than through sharp dynamic contrasts. The main technical challenges are phrasing (2.5/5) and legato (2.5/5): phrasing requires shaping short long-lined phrases so the ends and returns feel connected without breaks, and legato demands right-hand control to keep the melodic line smoothly linked across leaps and decorative notes. As the original second movement of Sonata No. 31, it belongs to the composer’s small-scale keyboard sonata output typical of salon repertoire. I do not provide reference recordings here because I cannot state any performer with complete confidence for this specific piece.

MusicCoach difficulty
34/100
Elementary
Likely range : 22–46/100
Confidence : 55% · fair confidence
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 3 to 4

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Difficulty sources
Henle Verlag
3
28/100 normalised
Relative difficulty
4%
Among Antonio Soler
24%
Era
2%
Genre
Estimated skills
Technique
Legato
1
Interpretation
Phrasing
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression