Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.
Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.
Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.
The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.
Does this rating look right to you?
This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.
Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.
The safest next step.
A genuine step up, without a jolt.
A useful leap with guided practice.
This G major sonata is bright and playful, with sprightly allegretto-like passages that call for crisp energy and clear articulation rather than overly romantic phrasing. Technically, you will need to work on Phrasing (2.5/5) by shaping each motif so answers and sequences are audible, and Legato (2.5/5) to keep a smooth melodic line in the lilting passages where the hand must connect notes without losing rhythmic clarity, which requires careful fingering and touch connection. It is part of Clementi’s corpus of piano sonatas and reflects his focus on balancing virtuosity with clear contrapuntal writing. I do not give a reference performance here out of caution, since I cannot be certain of a specific recording for this work.