Sonate no 10 op. 14/2 : I. Allegro
Romantic Sonata Piano solo 11 min
In brief

The first movement is brisk and agile, built on short, pointed figures that call for crisp articulation and controlled drive rather than expansive, overtly lyrical phrasing. You will face specific challenges in Connaissance des formes (3.6/5) — concretely, recognizing exposition, development and recapitulation to shape repeats and responses — and in Analyse harmonique (3.6/5), which here means tracking quick modulations and inner voice-leading to shape phrases and prepare thematic returns. In Beethoven’s output this sonata belongs to his earlier piano works, occupying a position between Classical clarity and emerging personal touches that point toward the Romantic sensibility. I do not list a reference recording here out of caution, but I can recommend well-regarded performances if you tell me what you prefer.

Listen to this work

These recordings are found automatically, and the machine still gets it wrong. One click from you — yes or no — fixes the catalogue for every musician who opens this page after you. Across our 10,000 works, your answer is our only real quality check.

An arrangement or transcription is fine: if you recognise the work, answer yes. Answer no if it is a different work, a different composer, or if the recording does not play.

  • Play — 백건우 Kunwoo Paik - Beethoven : Piano Sonata No.10, Op.14-2 : I. Allegro · KBS클래식 Classic (the player loads on click)

    Open on Youtube ↗

    Is this the right work?

No account is required and no personal data is collected.

MusicCoach difficulty
53/100
Intermediate
Likely range : 46–61/100
Confidence : 43% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 6

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Relative difficulty
41%
Among Ludwig van Beethoven
40%
Era Romantic
34%
Genre
Estimated skills
Theory
Harmonic analysis
1
Theory
Knowledge of forms
1
Pedaling
Sustain pedal
1
Style
Romantic style
1
Rhythm
Tempo rubato
1
Tone
Hand balance
1
Technique
Hand independence
1
Interpretation
Dynamics
1
Technique
Fast passages
1
Interpretation
Phrasing
1
Rhythm
General rhythm
1
Style
Classical style
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression