Rondo B flat major Anh. 6
Rondo Piano solo ~4 min
In brief

This Rondo in B-flat presents a bright, nimble character with contrasting episodes that require rhythmic clarity to keep its dance-like feel. Technically, you will need to focus on Phrasing (2.5/5) to shape the short phrases and their responses, and Hand Independence (2.5/5) to sustain a steady bass while allowing the right hand melody to sing; this calls for controlled wrist action and precise coordination of durations between the hands. The work's attribution and period are uncertain in Beethoven's catalogue (listed in the Anhang), so it stands among pieces of debated provenance or early works rather than the composer's central output. I do not provide a recommended recording here, as I am not certain of a widely recognized reference for this specific piece.

MusicCoach difficulty
54/100
Intermediate
Likely range : 39–70/100
Confidence : 57% · fair confidence
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 6

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Difficulty sources
Henle Verlag
6
62/100 normalised · 2 obs.
Relative difficulty
43%
Among Ludwig van Beethoven
61%
Era
35%
Genre
Estimated skills
Technique
Hand independence
1
Interpretation
Dynamics
1
Interpretation
Phrasing
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression