These recordings are found automatically, and the machine still gets it wrong. One click from you — yes or no — fixes the catalogue for every musician who opens this page after you. Across our 10,000 works, your answer is our only real quality check.
An arrangement or transcription is fine: if you recognise the work, answer yes. Answer no if it is a different work, a different composer, or if the recording does not play.
-
Play — Beethoven - Piano Sonata No. 10 in G major, Op. 14, No. 2 (Audio+Sheet) [Cziffra] · PianoJFAudioSheet (the player loads on click)
Is this the right work? -
Play — Piano Sonata No. 10 in G Major, Op. 14 No. 2: I. Allegro · Ludwig van Beethoven, Daniel Barenboim (the player loads on click)
Is this the right work?
No account is required and no personal data is collected.
Public-domain sheet music on IMSLP ↗
Official level, taken from the exam syllabus.
Other syllabi : AMEB Grade 6
Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.
Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.
The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.
Does this rating look right to you?
This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.
One rarely plays the whole work: each movement has its own level — often very different from the opus's overall score.
Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.
The safest next step.
A genuine step up, without a jolt.
A useful leap with guided practice.
This sonata presents a bright, conversational character with clear rhythmic propulsion and lyrical responses that favor pointed surprises over large-scale drama. Technically, two skills will be important: Analyse harmonique (3.6/5), which here means identifying quick modulations and adjusting touch and pedaling to clarify transitional harmonies, and Connaissance des formes (3.6/5), needed to delineate exposition, development and recapitulation and to handle repeats and cuts smoothly. It belongs to the composer’s piano sonatas and sits within the trajectory toward more lyrical and formally adventurous works in his output. I am not providing a reference interpretation because I prefer not to give a recording attribution unless I am completely certain of it.