These recordings are found automatically, and the machine still gets it wrong. One click from you — yes or no — fixes the catalogue for every musician who opens this page after you. Across our 10,000 works, your answer is our only real quality check.
An arrangement or transcription is fine: if you recognise the work, answer yes. Answer no if it is a different work, a different composer, or if the recording does not play.
-
Play — 손열음│슈만, 크라이슬레리아나 (R.Schumann, Kreisleriana Op.16) Pf. YeolEum Son · TV예술무대 (the player loads on click)
Is this the right work? -
Play — Kreisleriana, Op. 16: No. 8 in G Minor, Schnell und spielend · Robert Schumann, Adam Laloum (the player loads on click)
Is this the right work?
No account is required and no personal data is collected.
Official level, taken from the exam syllabus.
Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.
Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.
The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.
Does this rating look right to you?
This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.
Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.
The safest next step.
A genuine step up, without a jolt.
A useful leap with guided practice.
This first piece of the Kreisleriana alternates nervous outbursts and percussive figures, with sudden replies and an often troubled character rather than a simple lyricism. You will face notably the Passages rapides (4.6/5), which require even, secure finger work and economical wrist motion to keep clarity at high speed, and Independence of the hands (4.6/5), which asks you to stabilize an accompanying hand while the other plays agile, contrasting motifs. The work sits in the Romantic piano repertoire and is one movement of the Kreisleriana set, conceived as a series of contrasting character pieces. I do not give a reference recording here because I am not fully certain of a single, widely acknowledged recording for this specific piece.