These recordings are found automatically, and the machine still gets it wrong. One click from you — yes or no — fixes the catalogue for every musician who opens this page after you. Across our 10,000 works, your answer is our only real quality check.
An arrangement or transcription is fine: if you recognise the work, answer yes. Answer no if it is a different work, a different composer, or if the recording does not play.
-
Play — Nelson Freire: Robert Schumann - Fantasy in C major, Op. 17 (1983) · LOFTmusic (the player loads on click)
Is this the right work? -
Play — Fantasy Op. 17 in C Major: 3. Langsam getragen: Durchweg leise zu halten · Robert Schumann, Evgeny Kissin (the player loads on click)
Is this the right work?
No account is required and no personal data is collected.
Public-domain sheet music on IMSLP ↗
The grade scale stops at 8; this work belongs to concert or diploma repertoire.
Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.
Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.
The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.
Does this rating look right to you?
This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.
Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.
The safest next step.
A genuine step up, without a jolt.
A useful leap with guided practice.
This Fantasy in C major projects alternating dramatic and lyrical intensity, with heroic episodes and reflective passages requiring sustained line and contrast. The main technical challenges noted are Tempo rubato (3.1/5), which here requires controlling subtle rhythmic inflections to shape delays and accelerations without losing the underlying pulse, and Phrasing (2.5/5), which demands shaping each phrase through touch and breath to keep long melodic lines coherent. A major Romantic piano work, it holds a central place in Schumann’s output as a large-scale piece that fuses lyricism and pianistic drama. I do not provide a reference interpretation because I cannot state one with complete certainty.