Suite no. 26 in D minor, T.305
Baroque Suite Piano solo ~8 min
In brief

This Suite in D minor has a restrained, contrapuntal character with alternating dance-like movements and inward narrations, featuring dark bass lines that call for crisp articulation and a strong sense of baroque dance. You will need to focus particularly on Ornaments (baroque) (4.1/5) — here that means executing turns and short embellishments with quick attacks and immediate releases to preserve the cadence — and Bass-clef reading (Lecture clé de fa) (3.1/5), since the left hand carries low voices requiring accurate reading and steady finger placement for jumps and inner-voice clarity. As a baroque piece, it belongs among the composer's dance-suite output, emphasizing polyphony and clear voice-leading rather than overt virtuosity. I do not provide a reference interpretation here because I am not fully certain of a specific widely recognized recording for this exact work.

MusicCoach difficulty
46/100
Intermediate
Likely range : 34–58/100
Confidence : 35% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 5

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Relative difficulty
46%
Among Johann Pachelbel
27%
Era Baroque
19%
Genre
Estimated skills
Theory
Knowledge of forms
1
Ornaments
Baroque ornaments
1
Style
Baroque style
1
Reading
Bass clef reading
1
Interpretation
Dynamics
1
Interpretation
Phrasing
1
Technique
Two-voice polyphony
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression