Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.
Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.
Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.
The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.
Does this rating look right to you?
This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.
Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.
The safest next step.
A genuine step up, without a jolt.
A useful leap with guided practice.
This pavan-and-galliard pair feels like a measured, courtly dance with restrained, breathing melodic cells and small ornamental touches rather than overt virtuosity. Technically, the Polyphony for three voices or more (2.5/5) requires independence of lines and careful balance — the concrete gesture is bringing an inner voice forward without silencing the others — and Phrasing (2.5/5) calls for clear shaping of long values that link the musical sentences while keeping the dance pulse. The piece sits within the English Renaissance dance repertoire as part of the tradition where pavans and galliards function as complementary courtly pieces. I do not give a precise reference performance because I am not 100% certain of a single recording universally acknowledged for this exact work.