Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.
Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.
Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.
The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.
Does this rating look right to you?
This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.
Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.
The safest next step.
A genuine step up, without a jolt.
A useful leap with guided practice.
These Fantasie a quattro present tight contrapuntal dialogues and crisp attacks alternating with improvisatory digressions: the character swings between rhythmic drive and moments of chiaroscuro that require clear articulation. You will need to work on Lecture clé de fa (3.1/5), which here means quickly reading lower-register parts written in the F-clef and mapping those voices to left-hand gestures without losing the clarity of inner lines, and on Ornements baroque (3.1/5), which requires short, precise embellishments (mordents, appoggiaturas) executed with fine wrist control to maintain the underlying dance. Placed in the Baroque period, these fantasias are part of Frescobaldi’s instrumental output where he investigated free counterpoint and expressive virtuosity within his catalogue. I do not provide a performance reference because I do not have a single, definitely identified recording of this exact set to cite.