Cantabile, Op.16
Cello and Piano
In brief

This Cantabile for cello and piano feels warm and singing, built on long lines and the unfolding of phrases that require a continuous breathing sense rather than virtuosic display. You will need to focus especially on Legato d'archet (violoncelle) (4.0/5) — here that means very careful bow changes, finely controlled bow speed and pressure to produce unbroken lines — and on Phrasing (3.5/5), which asks you to shape each melodic arc like a breath, placing internal accents and releases deliberately. The piece is listed as Op. 16 in Rabaud's catalogue, but the period of composition is not specified in the information provided. I do not provide a reference recording because I am not fully certain of a definitive interpretation for this specific work.

Listen to this work

No verified recording for this work yet. We add more every week.

Sheet music

Public-domain sheet music on IMSLP ↗

Is this the right work?
Formation

Cello and piano · 2 performers

Required forces
Cello 1 performers
Piano 1 performers
Playable parts
Cello Piano
MusicCoach difficulty
44/100
Elementary
Likely range : 32–56/100
Confidence : 32% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 4 to 5

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Relative difficulty
Among Hippolyte François Rabaud
39%
Era
Genre
Estimated skills
Technique
Bow legato (cello)
1
Interpretation
Phrasing
1
Interpretation
Dynamics
1
Tone
Vibrato (cello)
1
Tone
Touch control
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression