Suite (Skordatur) c minor BWV 1011
Cello solo
In brief

The piece projects a tense, polyphonic character where several lines overlap and require crisp articulation so each voice remains distinct rather than expansive lyricism. You will face marked technical challenges: Polyphonie à trois voix ou plus (5.0/5) requires sustaining and balancing independent lines across the four strings, adjusting bow pressure and finger placement to bring out each voice, and Doigté complexe (5.0/5) involves tight digital positions, partial stops and extensions demanding millimetric left-hand precision; Changements de position (violoncelle) (4.5/5) here means rapid, frequent shifts between registers to preserve polyphonic continuity. The listing includes BWV 1011, placing the writing in dialogue with the Baroque repertoire, although the period of this edition is noted as unknown, so treat it as a Baroque transcription/reading for solo cello. I do not provide a reference interpretation because I am not certain of a definitive recording for this specific version.

MusicCoach difficulty
61/100
Intermediate
Likely range : 41–80/100
Confidence : 59% · fair confidence
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 6 to 7

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Difficulty sources
Henle Verlag
5
50/100 normalised · 2 obs.
Relative difficulty
32%
Among Eugene Ysaÿe
70%
Era
Genre
Estimated skills
Fingering
Complex fingering
1
Technique
Double stops (cello)
2
Style
Baroque style
1
Technique
Bow distribution (cello)
1
Technique
Intonation (cello)
2
Technique
Position changes (cello)
2
Ornaments
Baroque ornaments
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression