Andante pathétique, Op.86
Cello and Piano
In brief

The Andante pathétique unfolds in a restrained, melancholic mood, with long singing lines that require sustained expressive continuity rather than sudden dramatic outbursts. Technically, you will need to focus on Legato bowing (4.5/5) — here the gesture means keeping an even bow stroke, seamless changes of direction and precise contact point control — and Phrasing (4.5/5), which calls for shaping each phrase like a breath by adjusting articulation and note durations to reveal the expressive arc. The piece is catalogued as Op.86 for cello and piano, while the composer's period for this work is listed as unknown. I do not provide a recommended recording, being cautious about naming an interpretation unless I am certain it is a widely recognized reference for this specific work.

Listen to this work

No verified recording for this work yet. We add more every week.

Sheet music

Public-domain sheet music on IMSLP ↗

Is this the right work?
Formation

Cello and piano · 2 performers

Required forces
Cello 1 performers
Piano 1 performers
Playable parts
Cello Piano
MusicCoach difficulty
56/100
Intermediate
Likely range : 44–68/100
Confidence : 28% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 6

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Relative difficulty
Among Fabian Rehfeld
62%
Era
Genre
Estimated skills
Technique
Bow legato
1
Interpretation
Phrasing
2
Technique
Bow legato (cello)
1
Tone
Vibrato
1
Interpretation
Dynamics
2
Tone
Vibrato (cello)
1
Style
Romantic style
1
Technique
Fast passages
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression