Etude Op.8 No.11 in B-flat minor
Étude Piano solo ~4 min
In brief

The piece projects a dark, tormented energy, with sharp chordal outbursts and an inner line that strives to surface above continuous agitation. Technically, focus on Scales and arpeggios (4.0/5) — here they require supported hand position and subtle wrist rotation to keep clarity and evenness — and Fast passages (4.0/5), which call for precise finger articulation and economy of motion to maintain clarity in rapid figures. It is part of the Études Op.8 collection, which belongs to his early piano output. I do not give a reference recording because I am not confident naming a specific, widely recognized performance for this particular study.

MusicCoach difficulty
70/100
Advanced
Likely range : 58–82/100
Confidence : 38% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 7 to 8

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Relative difficulty
66%
Among Alexander Scriabin
86%
Era
50%
Genre
Estimated skills
Technique
Scales and arpeggios
1
Technique
Fast passages
1
Tone
Touch control
1
Technique
Legato
1
Interpretation
Dynamics
1
Interpretation
Phrasing
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression