These recordings are found automatically, and the machine still gets it wrong. One click from you — yes or no — fixes the catalogue for every musician who opens this page after you. Across our 10,000 works, your answer is our only real quality check.
An arrangement or transcription is fine: if you recognise the work, answer yes. Answer no if it is a different work, a different composer, or if the recording does not play.
-
Play — Rachmaninoff: 9 Etudes-Tableaux Op.39 (Lugansky, Hayroudinoff, Sofronitsky) · Ashish Xiangyi Kumar (the player loads on click)
Is this the right work? -
Play — Etudes-tableaux, Op. 39: No. 4 in B Minor. Allegro assai · Sergei Rachmaninoff, Yuja Wang (the player loads on click)
Is this the right work?
No account is required and no personal data is collected.
Public-domain sheet music on IMSLP ↗
The grade scale stops at 8; this work belongs to concert or diploma repertoire.
Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.
Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.
The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.
Does this rating look right to you?
This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.
Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.
The safest next step.
A genuine step up, without a jolt.
A useful leap with guided practice.
No suggestion yet.
This piece projects a tense Romantic passion: broad harmonic gestures, bursts of massive chords and dramatic breaths that create a dark yet expansive soundscape. Technically you will face, in particular, Tempo rubato (3.1/5) which requires sustaining the musical line while allowing expressive shifts — concretely this means controlling the arm and wrist to stretch or compress phrases without losing forward drive — and Sustain pedal (3.1/5) which demands precise release and half‑pedaling to keep textures clear while preserving resonance. The work comes from Rachmaninoff’s late‑Romantic output and is part of his Etudes‑Tableaux group, pieces that fuse technical challenges with orchestral piano color.