Sonata for Piano (1924)
Sonata Piano solo ~12 min
In brief

This sonata has a tense, obsessive character, built more from repeated cells and abrupt harmonic shifts than from long cantabile melodies. You will particularly face Harmonic analysis (3.6/5): you must identify and follow unusual harmonic progressions to choose fingerings and connections that clarify inner voices; and Double notes (2.5/5): the technical gesture requires precise arm weight distribution and finger control to articulate double-voice passages crisply without losing the line. The period for this piece is listed as unknown; it should nevertheless be approached as part of the composer's piano sonata output and studied with attention to its harmonic language. I do not provide a reference interpretation here because I am not fully certain of a reliably identifiable recording.

MusicCoach difficulty
84/100
Master repertoire
Likely range : 72–96/100
Confidence : 42% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 8

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Relative difficulty
90%
Among Alexander Scriabin
98%
Era
96%
Genre
Estimated skills
Theory
Harmonic analysis
1
Theory
Knowledge of forms
1
Technique
Double notes
1
Interpretation
Dynamics
1
Technique
Octaves
1
Technique
Fast passages
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression