Intermezzo for Cello and Piano in A minor, EG115
Romantic Intermezzo Cello and Piano
In brief

The Intermezzo in A minor gives an intimate, lyrical melancholy, more like a spoken song than a sweeping drama, with quiet exchanges between cello and piano. Technically you should focus on Tempo rubato (3.1/5) — here the practical gesture is small rhythmic flexing within phrases, with slight retardations and anticipations that must be tightly coordinated with the piano — and on Dynamics/Nuances (2.5/5), which require delicate bow pressure and left-hand shading to shape subtle crescendos and diminuendos without losing the vocal line. The piece belongs to the Romantic period and is one of Grieg’s short, chamber intermezzos intended for intimate performance contexts. I do not provide a reference recording because I am not certain of a single widely recognized interpretation for this specific work.

Formation

Cello and piano · 2 performers

Required forces
Cello 1 performers
Piano 1 performers
Playable parts
Cello Piano
MusicCoach difficulty
41/100
Elementary
Likely range : 34–48/100
Confidence : 45% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 4 to 5

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Difficulty sources
MusicCoach expertise
45
45/100 normalised
Relative difficulty
8%
Among Edvard Grieg
8%
Era Romantic
Genre
Estimated skills
Style
Romantic style
1
Rhythm
Tempo rubato
1
Style
Character and style
1
Technique
Double notes
1
Technique
Legato
2
Interpretation
Dynamics
1
Interpretation
Phrasing
2
Tone
Vibrato (cello)
1
Interpretation
Singing voice
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression