Grand Concert Waltz, op. 41
Romantic Waltz Piano solo ~5 min
In brief

This Grand Concert Waltz presents itself as a danceable, shimmering piece where buoyant waltz motion alternates with more songlike passages, requiring a sense of swing and tonal color rather than mere virtuosity. You will need to focus especially on Tempo rubato (3.9/5), meaning control of subtle rhythmic flexions—stretching a bar slightly to express a line then returning to the pulse without losing forward motion—and on Phrasing (3.9/5), which here asks for shaping lines through precise finger legato, controlled attacks and voicing so the melody sings above the accompaniment. It belongs to the Romantic period as a salon/ concert waltz within Glazunov's output, meant to charm listeners while showcasing melodic craftsmanship.

MusicCoach difficulty
50/100
Intermediate
Likely range : 38–62/100
Confidence : 35% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 5 to 6

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Relative difficulty
44%
Among Alexander Glazunov
35%
Era Romantic
48%
Genre
Estimated skills
Rhythm
Tempo rubato
1
Interpretation
Phrasing
2
Pedaling
Sustain pedal
1
Style
Romantic style
1
Technique
Legato
1
Interpretation
Dynamics
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression