Nocturne no. 4, H.36
Romantic Nocturne Piano solo ~5 min
In brief

This Nocturne is lyrical and contemplative in character: the melodic line breathes long and is often suspended above a delicate accompaniment, with brief ornamented turns that call for restraint and tenderness. The main technical challenge lies in legato (4.4/5) and a singing tone (voix chantante, 4.4/5): the legato requires seamless finger connections and wrist control to avoid breaks, while the singing tone demands projecting the melody into the foreground without hardening the touch, carefully shaping dynamic nuances. From the Romantic period, this Nocturne belongs to Field's contribution to the invention and establishment of the nocturne genre, which significantly influenced the lyrical piano repertoire.

MusicCoach difficulty
54/100
Intermediate
Likely range : 42–66/100
Confidence : 35% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 6

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Relative difficulty
32%
Among John Field
41%
Era Romantic
22%
Genre
Estimated skills
Pedaling
Sustain pedal
1
Interpretation
Singing voice
1
Technique
Legato
2
Interpretation
Phrasing
2
Style
Romantic style
1
Rhythm
Tempo rubato
1
Interpretation
Dynamics
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression