These recordings are found automatically, and the machine still gets it wrong. One click from you — yes or no — fixes the catalogue for every musician who opens this page after you. Across our 10,000 works, your answer is our only real quality check.
An arrangement or transcription is fine: if you recognise the work, answer yes. Answer no if it is a different work, a different composer, or if the recording does not play.
-
Play — Beethoven - Piano Sonata No. 26 in E-flat major, Op. 81a -Les Adieux- - Artur Schnabel · Jacky Tran (the player loads on click)
Is this the right work? -
Play — Piano Sonata No. 26 in E-Flat Major, Op. 81a "Les adieux": I. Das Lebewohl. Adagio – Allegro · Ludwig van Beethoven, Wilhelm Kempff (the player loads on click)
Is this the right work?
No account is required and no personal data is collected.
Public-domain sheet music on IMSLP ↗
Official level, taken from the exam syllabus.
Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.
Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.
The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.
Does this rating look right to you?
This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.
One rarely plays the whole work: each movement has its own level — often very different from the opus's overall score.
Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.
The safest next step.
A genuine step up, without a jolt.
A useful leap with guided practice.
This sonata feels very concrete: terse farewell motifs, expressive pauses and lyrical episodes that alternate between contained irony and generous nostalgia, so each return of the theme must be marked like a small departure. You will need to focus especially on Dynamics (Nuances) (4.4/5) — here that means achieving clear dynamic gradations in attacks and releases by controlling arm weight and fingertip release on pianissimo responses and louder returns — and on Phrasing (Phrasé) (4.4/5), which requires shaping each line as a single breath, varying attack and anticipation so motifs sing without losing rhythmic articulation. In the composer’s output it occupies a place among his piano sonatas as a programmatic work often seen as a bridge between classical forms and a more Romantic expressive direction.