These recordings are found automatically, and the machine still gets it wrong. One click from you — yes or no — fixes the catalogue for every musician who opens this page after you. Across our 10,000 works, your answer is our only real quality check.
An arrangement or transcription is fine: if you recognise the work, answer yes. Answer no if it is a different work, a different composer, or if the recording does not play.
-
Play — Chopin: Mazurka in F Minor Op. 68 No. 4 - Jan Ekier, 1987 · davidhertzberg (the player loads on click)
Is this the right work? -
Play — Mazurka in F Minor, Op. Posth. 68: No. 4 Andantino · Frédéric Chopin, Maurizio Pollini (the player loads on click)
Is this the right work?
No account is required and no personal data is collected.
Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.
Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.
Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.
The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.
Does this rating look right to you?
This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.
Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.
The safest next step.
A genuine step up, without a jolt.
A useful leap with guided practice.
This mazurka has a restrained, wistful character, with folk-dance accents that appear as small uneasy reminiscences rather than grand gestures. You will need to work specifically on Polyrhythm 2 against 3 (2.5/5) by maintaining a steady pulse in the left hand while distributing ternary values in the right, which requires finger independence and careful weight control so both layers remain clear; the Tempo rubato (2.5/5) also calls for a very measured freedom, slightly stretching certain bars while reestablishing the harmonic line with small tempo returns, a gesture that relies on feeling and securing an internal pulse. The piece belongs to Chopin’s later mazurkas and reflects his concise, intimate approach to the genre rather than his large-scale concert works.