Piano Sonata no. 10, op. 70. Moderato - Allegro
Sonata Piano solo 13 min
In brief

This Piano Sonata feels tense and nervous, alternating winding motifs with percussive moments that call for clarity of texture rather than mere lyrical expression. Technically, the Passages rapides (2.5/5) here require a relaxed hand action with precise fingering and careful right/left coordination to keep fast figures clean at tempo, and the Analyse harmonique (2.5/5) requires identifying and shaping chromatic progressions to inform phrasing, voicing and dynamic shading. The period is listed as unknown; the piece nevertheless belongs to the composer’s body of piano sonatas and occupies a place in his piano catalogue. I do not provide a reference interpretation out of caution, as I cannot assert with certainty a single widely recognized recording for this exact sonata.

MusicCoach difficulty
82/100
Master repertoire
Likely range : 70–94/100
Confidence : 39% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 8

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Relative difficulty
8%
Among Александр Николаевич Скрябин
98%
Era
94%
Genre
Estimated skills
Theory
Harmonic analysis
1
Ornaments
Romantic ornaments
1
Technique
Fast passages
1
Style
Romantic style
1
Technique
General technique
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression