Sonatine op. 36/3 : III. Allegro
Sonatina Piano solo
In brief

The III. Allegro is lively and playful, built from short, skipping motifs and quick exchanges between the hands that call for a light, detached touch rather than broad legato. On the technical side, work on Style classique (3.8/5) by producing clear articulation and bringing out the main line — this requires clarifying voices and precise finger attacks to respect accentual contrasts — and address Gammes et arpèges (2.5/5) with accurate fingering and gentle wrist rotation to keep rapid runs fluid. The movement belongs to Clementi's pedagogical sonatinas and serves as a bright, didactic finale of the Sonatina op.36/3, aimed at building agility and formal awareness.

MusicCoach difficulty
42/100
Elementary
Likely range : 35–50/100
Confidence : 42% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 4 to 5

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Relative difficulty
87%
Among Muzio Clementi
38%
Era
80%
Genre
Estimated skills
Theory
Knowledge of forms
1
Style
Classical style
2
Technique
Scales and arpeggios
1
Technique
Hand independence
2
Technique
Octaves
1
Technique
Fast passages
1
Interpretation
Phrasing
1
Technique
General technique
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression