Sonate no 29 op. 106 « Hammerklavier » : II. Scherzo : Assai vivace
Romantic Sonata Piano solo
In brief

This second movement has a lively, percussive scherzo character, with abrupt accents and cuts that demand crisp articulation and a driving sense of motion. Technically you will need especially the Knowledge of forms (3.6/5) to delineate the scherzo–trio structure and manage repeats/variations coherently, and Tempo rubato (3.1/5) to apply small, controlled rhythmic flexibility without breaking the momentum — concretely that means shaping phrases as blocks and allocating propulsion between the hands so any rubato remains momentary and returns cleanly to tempo. The piece comes from Beethoven’s late period and occupies a central, highly ambitious place among his piano sonatas.

Listen to this work

These recordings are found automatically, and the machine still gets it wrong. One click from you — yes or no — fixes the catalogue for every musician who opens this page after you. Across our 10,000 works, your answer is our only real quality check.

An arrangement or transcription is fine: if you recognise the work, answer yes. Answer no if it is a different work, a different composer, or if the recording does not play.

  • Play — Beethoven: Piano Sonata No. 29 in B flat, Op. 106 -"Hammerklavier": 2. Scherzo (Assai vivace -... · Vladimir Ashkenazy - Topic (the player loads on click)

    Open on Youtube ↗

    Is this the right work?
  • Play — Grande Sonate No. 29 en si bémol majeur, Op. 106 dite Hammerklavier: II. Scherzo : Assai vivace · Ludwig van Beethoven, Jean-Frédéric Neuburger (the player loads on click)

    Open on Spotify ↗

    Is this the right work?

No account is required and no personal data is collected.

MusicCoach difficulty
87/100
Master repertoire
Likely range : 79–94/100
Confidence : 45% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
Beyond grade 8

The grade scale stops at 8; this work belongs to concert or diploma repertoire.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Relative difficulty
98%
Among Ludwig van Beethoven
97%
Era Romantic
98%
Genre
Estimated skills
Theory
Harmonic analysis
1
Theory
Knowledge of forms
1
Pedaling
Sustain pedal
1
Rhythm
Tempo rubato
1
Style
Romantic style
2
Tone
Touch control
1
Technique
Hand independence
2
Technique
Fast passages
2
Rhythm
Polyrhythm 2 against 3
1
Rhythm
General rhythm
1
Technique
Staccato
1
Rhythm
Syncopation
1
Technique
General technique
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

Ambitious challenge

A useful leap with guided practice.

No suggestion yet.

See the whole progression