These recordings are found automatically, and the machine still gets it wrong. One click from you — yes or no — fixes the catalogue for every musician who opens this page after you. Across our 10,000 works, your answer is our only real quality check.
An arrangement or transcription is fine: if you recognise the work, answer yes. Answer no if it is a different work, a different composer, or if the recording does not play.
-
Play — Beethoven Piano Sonata No 18 in E flat, op. 31/3, II. Scherzo. Allegretto vivace · Laurence Cummings (the player loads on click)
Is this the right work?
No account is required and no personal data is collected.
Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.
Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.
Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.
The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.
Does this rating look right to you?
This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.
Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.
The safest next step.
A genuine step up, without a jolt.
A useful leap with guided practice.
This second movement feels sprightly and incisive, with hunting-like accents and rhythmic thrusts that require lightness and crispness to keep its playful-yet-nervous character. Technically, Connaissance des formes (3.6/5) is key: you must clearly map repeats and contrasting sections so you can shape returns and transitions without losing forward drive; Tempo rubato (3.1/5) involves small, controlled tempo adjustments—brief anticipations or delays—while preserving rhythmic integrity and attack clarity. The piece sits within Beethoven’s piano sonata output and reflects his move toward more romantic expressive traits, using vivacity and irony within a compact scherzo-like structure. I do not give a reference recording here because I prefer not to risk an inaccurate recommendation.