These recordings are found automatically, and the machine still gets it wrong. One click from you — yes or no — fixes the catalogue for every musician who opens this page after you. Across our 10,000 works, your answer is our only real quality check.
An arrangement or transcription is fine: if you recognise the work, answer yes. Answer no if it is a different work, a different composer, or if the recording does not play.
-
Play — Beethoven: Piano Sonata No. 15 in D Major, Op. 28 - "Pastorale": IV. Rondo. Allegro ma non troppo · Maurizio Pollini - Topic (the player loads on click)
Is this the right work? -
Play — Piano Sonata No. 15 in D Major, Op. 28 "Pastoral": IV. Rondo. Allegro ma non troppo · Ludwig van Beethoven, Emil Gilels (the player loads on click)
Is this the right work?
No account is required and no personal data is collected.
Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.
Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.
Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.
The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.
Does this rating look right to you?
This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.
Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.
The safest next step.
A genuine step up, without a jolt.
A useful leap with guided practice.
The final Rondo has a breezy, pastoral drive, alternating sprightly, skipping phrases with more lyrical episodes that call for clear articulation and contained energy rather than flashy virtuosity. You will specifically face challenges in Connaissance des formes (3.6/5): identifying the returns of the refrain and shaping the reprises helps time breaths and secure clean transitions; and Analyse harmonique (3.6/5): tracking the harmonic progressions allows you to anticipate modulations and adjust chord release and dynamics accordingly. This sonata occupies a transitional spot between classical models and a more pastoral, early-romantic sensibility, felt in its balance of formal clarity and expressive warmth. I do not provide a reference interpretation here out of caution.