Etude f minor op. 42 no. 7
Étude Piano solo
In brief

The F minor étude unfolds a whirling, dark energy, alternating sharp rhythmic thrusts with taut melodic lines that give it a hammered yet singing character; sudden outbursts contrast with more subdued harmonic veils. Technically, Independence of the hands (2.5/5) will require clearly separating the accompanimental from the melodic hand to preserve pulse and accents without collapsing the line, and Half-pedaling (2.5/5) demands fine control of sustain to bring out harmonics without blurring the rapid attacks. The period is listed as unknown, but this is a piano solo étude that belongs to the composer's output focused on virtuosity and pianistic color. I do not provide a recommended recording here because I am not confident of a single authoritative interpretation for this exact piece.

MusicCoach difficulty
74/100
Advanced
Likely range : 69–80/100
Confidence : 55% · fair confidence
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 8

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Difficulty sources
Henle Verlag
7
74/100 normalised
Relative difficulty
77%
Among Alexander Scriabin
91%
Era
58%
Genre
Estimated skills
Pedaling
Half-pedalling
1
Technique
Hand independence
1
Interpretation
Dynamics
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression