Études-Tableaux, Op. 33
Étude Piano solo
In brief

This étude projects a biting, shadowy energy, switching between percussive figures and crushed-chord passages that call for a crisp attack and sustained darkness. You will face concrete challenges in Doigté complexe (2.5/5) — here that means rapid finger redistributions and abrupt position shifts to maintain inner voices while keeping flow — and in Nuances (2.5/5), which requires fine control of dynamic gradations between hands and across harmonic layers so the textures remain separated. The piece belongs to the Études-Tableaux, Op.33 for piano, a set of carefully crafted studies within Rachmaninoff's piano output.

Listen to this work

These recordings are found automatically, and the machine still gets it wrong. One click from you — yes or no — fixes the catalogue for every musician who opens this page after you. Across our 10,000 works, your answer is our only real quality check.

An arrangement or transcription is fine: if you recognise the work, answer yes. Answer no if it is a different work, a different composer, or if the recording does not play.

  • Play — Rachmaninoff: 8 Etudes-Tableaux Op.33 (Lugansky, Ashkenazy, Sofronitsky) · Ashish Xiangyi Kumar (the player loads on click)

    Open on Youtube ↗

    Is this the right work?

No account is required and no personal data is collected.

MusicCoach difficulty
87/100
Master repertoire
Likely range : 75–99/100
Confidence : 42% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
Beyond grade 8

The grade scale stops at 8; this work belongs to concert or diploma repertoire.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Relative difficulty
97%
Among Rachmaninoff
99%
Era
94%
Genre
Estimated skills
Tone
Touch control
1
Fingering
Complex fingering
1
Technique
Double notes
1
Technique
Hand independence
1
Interpretation
Dynamics
1
Technique
Octaves
1
Technique
Fast passages
1
Pedaling
Sustain pedal
1
Interpretation
Phrasing
1
Style
Romantic style
1
Technique
General technique
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

Ambitious challenge

A useful leap with guided practice.

No suggestion yet.

See the whole progression