Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.
Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.
Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.
The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.
Does this rating look right to you?
This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.
Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.
The safest next step.
A genuine step up, without a jolt.
A useful leap with guided practice.
This Rondo in F feels sprightly and slightly nervous, with bright refrains and contrasting episodes that call for crisp articulation and a buoyant, clipped rhythmic drive rather than long lyrical lines. You will need to focus on Connaissance des formes (3.1/5) to recognise and mark the return of the main refrain with a clear shaping gesture for reprises and transitions, and on Phrasé (2.5/5) to sculpt the short phrases through precise finger control and articulation so motifs remain flexible despite their brevity. The piece belongs to the Classical period and sits within Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach’s keyboard output, showing his tendency toward formal clarity and character contrast. I do not list a reference interpretation here out of caution; I can suggest recordings after confirming specific candidates.