Polonoise in C minor, H.154, Wq.116, no. 22
Classical Piano solo ~2 min
In brief

This Polonoise in C minor has the character of a measured, slightly accented dance, with clear beats that require maintaining a steady pulse while preserving phrase shape; there are also contrasting moments of forward drive that must remain controlled. Technically, the skill « Style classique (3.1/5) » here means focusing on ternary articulation and clean stress placement to convey the polonaise gait without anachronism, and the skill « Phrasing (2.5/5) » requires shaping melodic arcs by slight lengthening and easing of tension rather than showy gestures — concrete wrist and touch control to bring out the lines. It belongs to the Classical period and is one of C.P.E. Bach's keyboard pieces that treat dance forms with a more immediate expressivity than his father's. I do not list a reference interpretation because I am not sufficiently certain of a specific, widely recognized recording for this work.

MusicCoach difficulty
44/100
Elementary
Likely range : 32–56/100
Confidence : 35% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 4 to 5

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Relative difficulty
34%
Among Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach
34%
Era Classical
Genre
Estimated skills
Theory
Knowledge of forms
1
Style
Classical style
1
Technique
Legato
1
Interpretation
Dynamics
1
Interpretation
Phrasing
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression