Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.
Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.
Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.
The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.
Does this rating look right to you?
This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.
Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.
The safest next step.
A genuine step up, without a jolt.
A useful leap with guided practice.
These G major Variations are sprightly and transparent, built on a simple theme that is altered through delicate ornamentation and conversational interplay between the hands rather than grand drama. You will need to focus on Phrasing (2.5/5) by shaping each short phrase so the thematic logic remains clear — this means planning anchors, slight relaxations and differentiated attacks — and on Nuances (2.5/5) to make small dynamic gradations audible, which requires fine touch control and controlled changes in hand weight. The piece is a set of piano solo variations and, with the period listed as unknown, it should be regarded as part of the composer's salon/keyboard output rather than a central work of the piano repertoire. I do not provide a recommended recording here because I am not certain of an established reference performance for this specific piece.