Burgmüller - Arpège Op.109 No.1
Piano solo ~2 min
In brief

This piece feels bright and playful: it relies on sparkling arpeggios and a light accompaniment that create a continuous flowing motion rather than long lyrical lines. Technically, you will need to focus on Scales and arpeggios (4.1/5) — here that means ensuring evenness and a supple wrist rotation to produce smooth rolls — and Fast passages (4.1/5), which demand finger independence and economy of motion to keep clarity and precision in the rapid figures. It is part of Burgmüller's pedagogical repertoire, intended to build agility and control in students and sits within his collections of piano studies.

Listen to this work

No verified recording for this work yet. We add more every week.

Sheet music

Public-domain sheet music on IMSLP ↗

Is this the right work?
MusicCoach difficulty
34/100
Elementary
Likely range : 28–40/100
Confidence : 57% · fair confidence
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 3 to 4

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Difficulty sources
Combined exam syllabi
Grade 4
36/100 normalised
Relative difficulty
89%
Among Friedrich Burgmüller
24%
Era
Genre
Estimated skills
Technique
Scales and arpeggios
1
Technique
Fast passages
1
Technique
Legato
1
Interpretation
Dynamics
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression