Sonatina Op.37 No.2
Sonatina Piano solo ~7 min
In brief

The piece conveys a cheerful, poised clarity, like a small salon movement where motifs answer one another with crispness and wit. You will need to work especially on Connaissance des formes (3.8/5) to shape repeats and balance harmonic phrasing, and on Style classique (3.8/5) which calls for precise articulation and steady tempo to keep the texture transparent; concretely this means light, attentive articulation and controlled transitions rather than broad, romantic gestures. It is a pedagogical sonatina within Reinecke’s output, intended to develop formal and stylistic skills more than virtuosic display. I do not give a recommended reference recording because I do not have sufficient certainty about a specific definitive interpretation for this piece.

Listen to this work

No verified recording for this work yet. We add more every week.

Sheet music

Public-domain sheet music on IMSLP ↗

Is this the right work?
MusicCoach difficulty
34/100
Elementary
Likely range : 28–40/100
Confidence : 53% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
On the syllabus: Grade 4 Trinity_London

Official level, taken from the exam syllabus.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Difficulty sources
Combined exam syllabi
Grade 4
36/100 normalised
Relative difficulty
88%
Among Carl Reinecke
24%
Era
48%
Genre
Estimated skills
Theory
Knowledge of forms
1
Style
Classical style
1
Technique
Legato
1
Interpretation
Phrasing
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression