Official level, taken from the exam syllabus.
Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.
Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.
The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.
Does this rating look right to you?
This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.
Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.
The safest next step.
A genuine step up, without a jolt.
A useful leap with guided practice.
This “Mouvement” projects a tense, incisive character, built from crisp rhythmic replies and flashes of texture that emphasize color over lyrical song. You will work mainly with Double notes (2.5/5), which require precise, coordinated attacks between adjacent fingers to articulate two voices cleanly without buzzing, and with Dynamics/Nuances (2.5/5), demanding fine control of hand weight and subtle dynamic shifts to keep clarity across layers. The piece is from Images, Book I, and occupies a place in Debussy’s piano output as an investigation of timbre and texture rather than straightforward virtuosity. I have not given a recommended recording because I’m not fully certain of a single authoritative interpretation for this specific number.