Waltz in A minor Op.39 No.15 (arr.)
Waltz Piano solo Arrangement 2 min
In brief

This waltz feels airy with a faint melancholy, requiring a steady danceable sway while allowing brief suspended, expressive moments — part light salon dance, part restrained lyricism. Technically you will face the Phrasing (3.9/5), which here means shaping the melody with a secure legato and right‑hand support to project the voice, and Tempo rubato (3.9/5), which requires micro‑adjustments of the pulse: very controlled small advances and delays without losing the underlying beat. The piece belongs to Brahms’s set of piano waltzes in Op.39, where he combines salon character with lyrical depth. I do not provide a recommended recording because I am not fully certain of a single widely recognized reference for this specific arrangement.

MusicCoach difficulty
21/100
Beginner
Likely range : 7–36/100
Confidence : 62% · fair confidence
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
On the syllabus: Grade 2 ABRSM

Official level, taken from the exam syllabus.

Other syllabi : AMEB Grade 1

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Difficulty sources
Combined exam syllabi
Grade 1
12/100 normalised
Combined exam syllabi
Grade 2
20/100 normalised
Relative difficulty
2%
Among Johannes Brahms
10%
Era
2%
Genre
Estimated skills
Rhythm
Tempo rubato
1
Interpretation
Phrasing
2
Interpretation
Dynamics
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression