Melodia
Piano solo ~2 min
In brief

Melodia feels like a short, poised cantabile piece: a clear tune over a discreet accompaniment that calls for a singing line and a rounded touch so the melody stands out without pushing. The main technical challenges are Sight-reading (2.5/5) — you must track harmonic shifts and maintain the rhythmic thread while keeping your eyes off the keys — and Phrasing (2.5/5) — shaping small melodic arches, managing attacks and releases so the little crescendos and diminuendos feel natural. The piece belongs to Gurlitt’s output of piano miniatures, typical of salon and pedagogical repertoire rather than large-scale concert works. I do not provide a recording reference here because I am not certain of a single widely recognized interpretation for this specific piece.

MusicCoach difficulty
17/100
Beginner
Likely range : 8–26/100
Confidence : 55% · fair confidence
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
On the syllabus: Grade 1 ABRSM

Official level, taken from the exam syllabus.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Difficulty sources
Combined exam syllabi
Grade 1
12/100 normalised
Relative difficulty
Among Cornelius Gurlitt
7%
Era
Genre
Estimated skills
Sight-reading
Sight-reading
1
Interpretation
Phrasing
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression