Allegretto in D major, H.302, Wq.116, no. 20
Classical Piano solo ~2 min
In brief

This Allegretto in D major feels bright and agile, with short, balanced phrases and clear alternations of motifs that call for transparency rather than showiness. The technical challenges you will face include Connaissance des formes (3.1/5), which here means identifying and shaping repeated sections and cadences so the overall structure remains audible, and Phrasé (2.5/5), which requires finely controlled finger touches and subtle wrist adjustments to connect small phrases while preserving classical articulation. The piece belongs to the Classical period and sits among C.P.E. Bach’s short keyboard works that highlight contrast and formal clarity. I am not giving a reference recording because I cannot be fully certain of a specific, widely recognised performance for this particular piece.

MusicCoach difficulty
40/100
Elementary
Likely range : 28–52/100
Confidence : 35% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 4

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Relative difficulty
22%
Among Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach
23%
Era Classical
Genre
Estimated skills
Theory
Knowledge of forms
1
Style
Classical style
1
Style
Character and style
1
Interpretation
Phrasing
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression