These recordings are found automatically, and the machine still gets it wrong. One click from you — yes or no — fixes the catalogue for every musician who opens this page after you. Across our 10,000 works, your answer is our only real quality check.
An arrangement or transcription is fine: if you recognise the work, answer yes. Answer no if it is a different work, a different composer, or if the recording does not play.
-
Play — Étude in C minor, Opus 10 No. 12 (Revolutionary) - Chopin [Piano Tutorial] (Synthesia) · Piano Music Bros. (the player loads on click)
1 person confirms this is the right work.
Is this the right work? -
Play — Étude in C Minor, Op. 10, No. 12 "Revolutionary" · Frédéric Chopin, Vladimir Horowitz (the player loads on click)
1 person confirms this is the right work.
Is this the right work?
No account is required and no personal data is collected.
Official level, taken from the exam syllabus.
Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.
Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.
The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.
Does this rating look right to you?
This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.
Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.
The safest next step.
A genuine step up, without a jolt.
A useful leap with guided practice.
The piece projects a martial urgency and a dramatic whirlwind, with forceful attacks and a near-continuous flow that allows little respite. Technically, the Octaves (4.8/5) here require repeated, robust strikes across wide intervals with wrist stability and economy of motion, and Hand Independence (4.4/5) demands simultaneously rendering an often obstinate accompaniment with one hand while the other unfolds contrasting phrases — gestures that call for control and precision. This étude is part of Chopin's Etudes Op.10, a key set in his output that highlights his work on virtuosic pianistic technique and expressivity. I do not provide a reference interpretation because I am not fully certain of a specific recording I could name with complete confidence.