Berceuse in E major, for 2 pianos, op. 105
Romantic Lullaby Two pianos
In brief

This Berceuse in E major unfolds a gentle, intimate mood, with a lullaby melody exchanged between the two pianos in small sighs and subtle dynamic folds. You will mainly face the challenge of conveying a “Voix chantante (4.1/5)”: you must project the melodic line as if it were singing, shaping each phrase through touch, nuance and sustained tone; and the “Pédale de sustain (4.1/5)” requires precise control of release to connect harmonics without blurring the voices — a supple pedal gesture timed with chord changes is essential here. The piece belongs to Saint‑Saëns’s late Romantic salon repertoire for two pianos, more intimate in scale than his large orchestral works. I do not give a reference recording because I am not certain of a single widely recognized interpretation for this specific piece.

Listen to this work

No verified recording for this work yet. We add more every week.

Sheet music

Public-domain sheet music on IMSLP ↗

Is this the right work?
Formation

Two pianos · 2 performers

Required forces
Piano 2 performers
Playable parts
Piano I Piano II
MusicCoach difficulty
30/100
Elementary
Likely range : 18–42/100
Confidence : 35% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 3

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Relative difficulty
12%
Among Camille Saint-Saëns
3%
Era Romantic
23%
Genre
Estimated skills
Pedaling
Sustain pedal
1
Interpretation
Singing voice
1
Technique
Legato
2
Style
Romantic style
1
Rhythm
Tempo rubato
1
Interpretation
Dynamics
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression