These recordings are found automatically, and the machine still gets it wrong. One click from you — yes or no — fixes the catalogue for every musician who opens this page after you. Across our 10,000 works, your answer is our only real quality check.
An arrangement or transcription is fine: if you recognise the work, answer yes. Answer no if it is a different work, a different composer, or if the recording does not play.
-
Play — 3 Pièces op. 59 · Vestard Shimkus (the player loads on click)
Is this the right work? -
Play — Three Pieces, Op. 59: III. Pastoral Sonatina · Sergei Prokofiev, Frederic Chiu (the player loads on click)
Is this the right work?
No account is required and no personal data is collected.
Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.
Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.
Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.
The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.
Does this rating look right to you?
This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.
Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.
The safest next step.
A genuine step up, without a jolt.
A useful leap with guided practice.
These Three Pieces, Op. 59, have a tense, incisive character: short rhythmic bursts and melodic cells alternating between percussive gestures and more airy passages, giving the feel of a set of compact, color-driven miniatures. You will need to work on Polyrhythm 2 against 3 (3.1/5) by stabilizing the internal subdivision — here that means keeping a steady triplet pulse in one hand while the other articulates binary semiquavers, aligning accents and thumb entries to prevent timing drift; and on the Impressionistic style (3.1/5), which requires a refined touch and careful pedaling to preserve harmonic color without blurring the texture. The work belongs to Prokofiev's modern period and fits within his piano output of short, exploratory pieces rather than extended forms. I do not provide a recommended recording because I am not confident about naming a single, clearly established reference for this exact set.