Per slava, for cello solo
Cello solo
In brief

This solo-cello piece is simultaneously tense and percussive, calling for crisp attacks, often dry tone, and stretches of sustained material where resonance shifts quickly. You will specifically face Doubles stops (cello) (4.3/5), which require keeping simultaneous intervals steady by adjusting bow pressure and angle to balance both voices, and Intonation (cello) (4.3/5), which demands micro-adjustments of the left hand on unfamiliar positions to land precise fourths and micro-intervals; practically this means very fine sliding control and precise finger anchoring. Within Penderecki’s output, the work belongs to his pieces for solo instruments that probe instrumental timbre and expressive gesture. I do not provide a reference interpretation because I am not certain of a widely recognized recording for this particular piece.

MusicCoach difficulty
72/100
Advanced
Likely range : 65–79/100
Confidence : 40% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 7 to 8

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Difficulty sources
MusicCoach expertise
72
72/100 normalised
Relative difficulty
36%
Among Krzysztof Penderecki
84%
Era
Genre
Estimated skills
Technique
Double stops (cello)
1
Technique
Thumb position
1
Technique
Position changes (cello)
2
Technique
Intonation (cello)
2
Technique
Harmonics (cello)
1
Interpretation
Dynamics
1
Interpretation
Phrasing
1
Rhythm
General rhythm
1
Technique
General technique
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression