No verified recording for this work yet. We add more every week.
Public-domain sheet music on IMSLP ↗
Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.
Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.
Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.
The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.
Does this rating look right to you?
This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.
Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.
The safest next step.
A genuine step up, without a jolt.
A useful leap with guided practice.
This violin concerto has a cheerful, graceful character, shifting between lyrical passages and bright virtuoso moments with a steady galant pulse. Technically, pay attention to Connaissance des formes (3.1/5): you must clearly mark repeats and transitions between tutti and solo to shape phrases appropriately, and to Style classique (3.1/5) which requires crisp articulation and well-placed tempo accents — concretely, prepare attacks and breaths so motifs answer each other cleanly; Contrôle du toucher (2.5/5) and Indépendance des mains (2.5/5) call for refined control of dynamics and flexible fingering to maintain a pure line in faster passages while coordinating with the orchestra. From a contextual standpoint, it belongs to the Classical period and is one of Mozart's early concertos that balance showy virtuosity with the formal clarity of the concerto genre. I do not provide a recording recommendation here rather than risk citing an uncertain attribution.