Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.
Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.
Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.
The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.
Does this rating look right to you?
This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.
Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.
The safest next step.
A genuine step up, without a jolt.
A useful leap with guided practice.
This Sonatina in E by Mendelssohn feels bright and sprightly, alternating sparkling figures with singable episodes that require a clean, transparent touch and clear articulation. Among the technical challenges, the skill “Style classique (3.8/5)” here requires precise attacks and phrase breaths — in practice crisp detachés and careful dynamic balances to preserve the sonatina shape — and “Connaissance des formes (3.8/5)” requires you to mark repeats and harmonic transitions with suitable dynamic and agogic shaping. It belongs to the Romantic period but leans toward classical models and pedagogical purposes, typically placed among Mendelssohn’s lighter character pieces. I do not give a reference performance because I prefer not to risk attributing a specific recording to this particular work without full certainty.