These recordings are found automatically, and the machine still gets it wrong. One click from you — yes or no — fixes the catalogue for every musician who opens this page after you. Across our 10,000 works, your answer is our only real quality check.
An arrangement or transcription is fine: if you recognise the work, answer yes. Answer no if it is a different work, a different composer, or if the recording does not play.
-
Play — J. S. Bach - Fugue in B Minor on a theme by Tomaso Albinoni BWV 951 - G. Gould, Piano · Jacopo Montigiani (the player loads on click)
1 person confirms this is the right work.
Is this the right work? -
Play — Bach, JS: Fugue on a Theme by Albinoni in B Minor, BWV 951 · Johann Sebastian Bach, Pierre Hantaï (the player loads on click)
1 person confirms this is the right work.
Is this the right work?
No account is required and no personal data is collected.
Public-domain sheet music on IMSLP ↗
Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.
Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.
Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.
The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.
Does this rating look right to you?
This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.
Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.
The safest next step.
A genuine step up, without a jolt.
A useful leap with guided practice.
This fugue gives a restrained, sombre intensity, with relentless entries that build dramatic shape through contrapuntal layering rather than flashy virtuosity; the piece calls for crisp articulation so each voice remains distinct while contributing to the overall drive. You will be challenged particularly by the skill « Polyphonie à trois voix ou plus (4.4/5) », which here means distributing lines between the hands and maintaining digital independence to keep counterpoints clear, and by « Analyse harmonique (4.4/5) », which helps you spot modulating passages so you can anticipate resolutions and adjust dynamics and fingering accordingly. As a Baroque work, it belongs to Bach’s keyboard contrapuntal output where transcription and strict counterpoint play a central role in his catalogue. I do not provide a reference recording because I am not completely certain of a specific, universally recognized interpretation for this exact fugue.