These recordings are found automatically, and the machine still gets it wrong. One click from you — yes or no — fixes the catalogue for every musician who opens this page after you. Across our 10,000 works, your answer is our only real quality check.
An arrangement or transcription is fine: if you recognise the work, answer yes. Answer no if it is a different work, a different composer, or if the recording does not play.
-
Play — J. S. Bach - Fugue in G Major BWV 576 · Anders Söderlund (the player loads on click)
Is this the right work? -
Play — Bach, JS: Fugue in G Major, BWV 576 · Johann Sebastian Bach, Marie-Claire Alain (the player loads on click)
Is this the right work?
No account is required and no personal data is collected.
Public-domain sheet music on IMSLP ↗
Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.
Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.
Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.
The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.
Does this rating look right to you?
This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.
Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.
The safest next step.
A genuine step up, without a jolt.
A useful leap with guided practice.
This fugue projects a bright, driven energy with brisk contrapuntal exchanges that call for crisp articulation rather than uniform legato; its character is propulsive and winding, with each subject entry renewing the rhythmic momentum. The main technical challenges are Analysis harmonique (4.4/5), which here means identifying and shaping points of tension and resolution to color progressions (choices of dynamics and articulation at cadences), and Polyphony in three voices or more (4.4/5), which requires preserving voice independence through precise fingering, careful hand distribution and differentiated detaché to bring out each line. As a Baroque piece, it occupies a place in the composer's output as a firm contrapuntal exercise showing mastery of fugal writing and fits within his tradition of didactic and contrapuntal works. I have not provided a recommended recording because I am not fully confident of a single definitive interpretation for this specific fugue.