Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.
Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.
Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.
The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.
Does this rating look right to you?
This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.
Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.
The safest next step.
A genuine step up, without a jolt.
A useful leap with guided practice.
This piece has the character of a restrained, measured Renaissance dance with a steady drive and melodies that progress by short responses rather than wide, sweeping gestures. The concrete technical challenges for the student lie first in Phrasing (2.5/5) — you will need to shape small phrase units, decide subtle breathing or pausing points, and align those choices with recurring motifs — and in Legato (2.5/5), which requires finger connection and wrist control to smooth lines without blurring the contrapuntal clarity. The work belongs to the Renaissance period and reflects the taste for dance and instrumental pieces that paralleled vocal and chamber music in Gibbons's output around the turn of the 17th century. I do not give a reference recording here because I am not fully certain of a single, widely recognized performance for this exact piece.