Piano Sonata no. 1 in E flat major, op. 1, no. 1, H.8/1
Romantic Sonata Piano solo ~17 min
In brief

The piece feels like a formative sonata leaning toward Romantic elegance: singing themes and luminous transitions call for a clear touch and phrase articulation that lets the music breathe while maintaining forward motion. Connaissance des formes (3.6/5): you will need to identify and shape exposition, development and recapitulation concretely to balance repeats and dynamic contrast, taking care with how reprises are articulated; Analyse harmonique (3.6/5): the performance requires following the modulations and cadences precisely so you can anticipate harmonic tensions and adjust voice balance by subtle hand-weight changes. This E-flat major sonata is one of Field's early published piano works and sits at the start of his piano output, showing the shift from classical models toward an emerging Romantic style. I do not provide a recommended recording for this piece out of caution.

Listen to this work

No verified recording for this work yet. We add more every week.

Sheet music

Public-domain sheet music on IMSLP ↗

Is this the right work?
MusicCoach difficulty
70/100
Advanced
Likely range : 58–82/100
Confidence : 35% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 7 to 8

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Relative difficulty
95%
Among John Field
78%
Era Romantic
76%
Genre
Estimated skills
Theory
Harmonic analysis
1
Theory
Knowledge of forms
1
Pedaling
Sustain pedal
1
Style
Romantic style
1
Rhythm
Tempo rubato
1
Technique
Legato
1
Interpretation
Dynamics
1
Interpretation
Phrasing
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression