Nocturne no. 10, H.63
Romantic Nocturne Piano solo ~6 min
In brief

This Nocturne No. 10 unfolds in a lyrical, contemplative atmosphere: it requires sustaining an internal singing line with discreet breaths and a soft halo that never breaks the melodic continuity. The main technical challenges are Legato (4.4/5) — here you must connect notes using arm placement and controlled finger action to produce seamless melodic links — and Sustain Pedal (4.4/5) — it calls for precise changes and often half-pedaling to support resonance without blurring inner voices. Situated in the Romantic period, this nocturne demonstrates the composer's contribution to the development of the nocturne genre and the lyric piano repertoire.

MusicCoach difficulty
59/100
Intermediate
Likely range : 47–71/100
Confidence : 35% · to confirm
BeginnerIntermediateAdvancedVirtuoso
Exam grade
About grade 6 to 7

Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.

Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.

Where this work sits
050100

Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.

The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.

Does this rating look right to you?

This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.

Add a note (optional)

Your note is not published on the site: it is read in review.

Relative difficulty
56%
Among John Field
52%
Era Romantic
45%
Genre
Estimated skills
Pedaling
Sustain pedal
1
Interpretation
Phrasing
1
Interpretation
Singing voice
1
Technique
Legato
2
Style
Romantic style
1
Rhythm
Tempo rubato
1
Style
Character and style
1
Interpretation
Dynamics
1
What to play next?

Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.

See the whole progression