Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.
Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.
Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.
The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.
Does this rating look right to you?
This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.
Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.
The safest next step.
A genuine step up, without a jolt.
A useful leap with guided practice.
This sonata projects a tense, rhythmically driven character: often angular and dry, with percussive outbursts alternating with more open, near-pianissimo passages; it requires crisp attack and careful dynamic contrasts. Technically, focus on Connaissance des formes (3.6/5) which here means shaping the large-scale sections and articulating returning material so transitions remain clear, and on Polyrhythmie 2 contre 3 (3.1/5) which demands hand independence and very steady subdivision — using wrist and forearm control to keep a constant flow despite opposing accents. The piece belongs to Copland's modern period and occupies a notable place among his piano works as an example of his leaner, more rhythmically driven writing before his more overtly 'American' sound. I do not provide a recommended recording here because I am not completely certain of a single definitive interpretation for this specific work.