Estimated from our difficulty score, not taken from an exam syllabus. Checked against 333 works on the ABRSM syllabus: the exact grade is right 7 times out of 10, and within one grade 99 times out of 100.
Difficulty estimate by MusicCoach on a scale of 1 to 100.
Most works cluster between 45 and 65: a small score gap often marks a real step. The highlighted bar shows this work among those for the same instrument.
The MusicCoach difficulty measures a work's overall demands (technique, reading, stamina) on a shared 0-100 scale, consolidated from editorial and pedagogical reference points (Henle, exam syllabuses, curation) and our own analyses. It measures neither musical value nor the practice time YOU will need: two musicians of the same level can experience the same work very differently depending on their strengths (hands used to octaves, quick sight-reading…). The confidence reflects how many reference points sit behind the score and how well they agree — a lightly documented score is flagged “to validate”. For a truly personal bearing, the diagnostic and your space compare each work to YOUR estimated level, which the score alone cannot do.
Does this rating look right to you?
This rating is computed automatically from heterogeneous sources. It gets things wrong, sometimes badly. If you know this work, your answer is worth more than our computation: it tells us which ratings to review.
Skills not yet identified for this work.
Each suggestion combines difficulty gap, risk, confidence and skill overlap. The first two cards in each column are the most useful pedagogically.
The safest next step.
A genuine step up, without a jolt.
A useful leap with guided practice.
This Caprice No. 20 in C minor has an incisive, restless character, alternating brisk, energetic moments with more inward phrases that emphasize sharp expressive contrasts rather than long lyrical lines. The technical challenges follow from its being a violin solo caprice with an estimated difficulty of 62/100, meaning it will require focused work on the virtuosic passages and the overall command expected of solo repertoire, without other specific technical competencies specified. Within Pierre Rode’s output, these caprices serve as showpieces and studies that both display the violinist’s craft and enrich the salon and concert repertoire for the instrument. I do not provide reference recordings here because I am not sufficiently certain about particular interpreters for this exact piece.